The Great Circumcision Row (1890)
The dispute between Cardiff congregations conducted in the South Wales Echo
3.15 Miles
LOCATION: Frederick Street (now demolished)
The Great Circumcision Row (1890)
Although discipline within the nineteenth century Cardiff Jewish community was relatively tight and rigorous, community cohesion could break down.
1865
For instance in 1865 Gerson Gryham of 243 Bute Road (later Bute Street) accused the Jews of Cardiff, in letters that the Jewish Chronicle deemed too shocking to print, of a ‘really disgraceful' scene after the Sabbath service, taking their quarrels before the local, non-Jewish magistrates, and totally neglecting the religious education of their children.
© JHASW
Newspaper clipping: ‘State of the Jews of Cardiff’.
Image credit The Jewish Chronicle, 1 September 1865.
1890
However, perhaps the greatest break down in Cardiff’s community cohesion was the bitter dispute between East Terrace and ‘The New Synagogue’ then based in Frederick Street, though it would later go on to formal presence on Edward Place. This was an argument over a request that a boy should be circumcised in the synagogue on Yom Kippur, but reveals deeper divisions.
Jewish boys are circumcised on the eighth day, normally privately with a family party. But if the eighth day falls on the day of Atonement – the most solemn day of the year and a strict fast day – the old custom was to circumcise the baby in public in synagogue. However, by the late nineteenth century this practice had become controversial. A highly public ceremony of this nature would be regarded by many in establishment society as outlandish and was even disapproved of by the Chief Rabbi. So it seems a poor family was refused permission for public circumcision in open synagogue in the Old congregation and was promptly allowed it in the New.
On the day of Yom Kippur 1890 (despite the fact that traditionally Orthodox Jews would engage in no work including writing) a letter appeared in the South Wales Echo, claiming to be from a Jewish person present at the East Terrace Synagogue when the ritual was refused, alleging that had the supplicants been a rich family the ceremony would have been performed.
Newspaper clipping: ‘A Complaint from a Synagogue’. From South Wales Echo, 24 September 1890.
Image credit Media Wales. Image source The National Library of Wales.
Letter 2
Such a serious allegation immediately triggered a response and the secretary of the East Terrace Synagogue wrote to the Echo who published his letter the next day:
Newspaper clipping: ‘A Complaint from a Synagogue’. From South Wales Echo, 25 September 1890.
Image credit Media Wales. Image source The National Library of Wales.
Letter 3
Underneath this letter appeared one from the Secretary of the New Synagogue:
Newspaper clipping: ‘A Complaint from a Synagogue’. From South Wales Echo, 25 September 1890.
Image credit Media Wales. Image source The National Library of Wales.
Letter 4
Inevitably this did not cool the issue and the original witness responded in the Echo the next day:
Newspaper clipping: ‘A Complaint from a Synagogue’. From South Wales Echo, 26 September 1890.
Image credit Media Wales. Image source The National Library of Wales.
Letter 5
The next day the Secretary of the New Synagogue doubled down his attack. Here we are told that the ceremony took place somewhere on Frederick Street:
Newspaper clipping: ‘A Complaint from a Synagogue’. From South Wales Echo, 27 September 1890.
Image credit Media Wales. Image source The National Library of Wales.
This effectively ended the very public feud but the orthodox communities of Cardiff would remain bitter for years.
Sources (10) click to show
CONTINUE THE TRAIL
Trail
×
